Skip to content

Protobuf V3 #30

@runeglom

Description

@runeglom

Hi, as the need for protobuf V3 support has popped up on our end, we have started the PR
#29

We are grateful for any review and happy to discuss changes or improvements 😄

Cheers!


Not on my end. Generally speaking, there's no additional feature development planned, since this package currently meets all of DisasterAWARE's requirements.

I'm happy to review PRs though.

Originally posted by @nickzandbergen in #15

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions