|
| 1 | +- in this post, i will outline a short-term roadmap with a clear purpose |
| 2 | +- for recovering from chernobyl: the bug introduced in the recent update |
| 3 | +- as well as actions needed to address the price crisis |
| 4 | +- the main goal is to deliver short, impactful changes to shift swap price dynamics from negative to positive |
| 5 | +- ## [[main loop]] |
| 6 | + - this is the core of the cyber and cyb idea, which must always be the top priority for the team |
| 7 | + - we currently have something very close to grok like link-based content response system |
| 8 | + - optimizing this system is a growth point, including the funnel for selling [[the product]] |
| 9 | +- ## optimize the team |
| 10 | + - currently, all [[cybercongress]] rewards flow into the [[cybercongress fellows]] program |
| 11 | + - this significantly impacts the price negatively |
| 12 | + - however, program efficiency is low: only ~7 out of ~20 fellows are really active and helpful |
| 13 | + - the solution is as follows: |
| 14 | + - form a cyber core team from active members and pay them in external tokens |
| 15 | + - reduce fellowship rewards by 7 times |
| 16 | + - as a result, we will have an agile, dedicated team supported by a broad community that contributes as volunteers with some rewards |
| 17 | + - [[cyber congress]] has 10 ETH remaining in the Euler Foundation smart contract and about $70,000 in liquidity |
| 18 | + - we will use these resources to pay the core team temporarily |
| 19 | +- ## reduce validator set to 42 |
| 20 | + - during the recent update, more than half of the validators showed indifference to the project |
| 21 | + - this indifference has continuously impacted [[$BOOT]] price negatively |
| 22 | + - in reality, a reliable network does not require so many validators |
| 23 | + - we have decided to focus on an agile, proactive validator set |
| 24 | + - in the coming days, we will propose reducing the validator set |
| 25 | + - once the economics improve, we can consider expanding the validator set again |
| 26 | +- ## close gift |
| 27 | + - the stake in the gift increases staking rewards threefold |
| 28 | + - this action alone can significantly impact $BOOT sell pressure |
| 29 | + - the simplest solution is to burn it |
| 30 | + - we will need a consensus update for this |
| 31 | + - notes on this are available in the following [[cip]]: [[finalization of $BOOT distribution]] |
| 32 | +- ## fix channels |
| 33 | + - approximately $100,000 is stuck in channels |
| 34 | + - it will take several months to resolve this |
| 35 | + - this must remain a top priority |
| 36 | +- ## bridge to ethereum |
| 37 | + - we need a simple, functional bridge with the largest ecosystem |
| 38 | + - focus will be on building the UX and necessary infrastructure using [[graviton]] |
| 39 | + - this action also enables listing [[$BOOT]] on Uniswap |
| 40 | +- ## [[energy reform]] |
| 41 | + - the only possible fix for [[$A]] and [[$V]] is to redeploy tokens |
| 42 | + - we realized it is a good time for a complete redesign of energy tokenomics |
| 43 | + - it will take a month or two |
| 44 | + - in the end, we will have tokenomics designed to add value rather than extract it from the system |
| 45 | + - actions include the following [[cips]]: |
| 46 | + - [[energy mint using curve]] |
| 47 | + - [change economics](https://x.com/cyber_devs/status/1853233551468122554) of cyberlink creation |
| 48 | + - [[collect fee on moving A and V]] |
| 49 | + - [[staking on particles]] and [[eternal particles]] |
| 50 | + - [[staking on cyberlinks]] and [[eternal cyberlinks]] |
| 51 | + - until we redeploy tokens, the only way to obtain energy is to mint it using the old rules |
| 52 | + - energy will also remain non-transferable until redeployment |
| 53 | +- ## deploy new dex |
| 54 | + - the fastest and most reliable solution is to [deploy astroport](https://github.com/cybercongress/warp) |
| 55 | + - after migrating the frontend to the new dex, we will deploy a network upgrade to phase out old liquidity |
| 56 | +- ## deploy [[cybernet]] |
| 57 | + - we have already tested [[cybernet]] in spacepussy |
| 58 | + - what remains is reaching consensus on the root rewarding token and its economics |
| 59 | + - deploying it as soon as possible is essential |
| 60 | +- ## [[burn gas in H]] |
| 61 | + - this is a core business model for any blockchain |
| 62 | + - the sooner we implement it, the better |
| 63 | + - the goal is to implement an [[eip1559]]-like mechanism |
| 64 | +- ## deploy [[dao dao]] |
| 65 | + - an excellent software addition that could add significant utility to the network |
| 66 | + - includes [[daodao for senate]] and more |
| 67 | +- ## cybergraph and memes |
| 68 | + - memes are the future and an ideal use case for [[cybergraph]] |
| 69 | + - transforming [[nebula]] into memebula is a straightforward and efficient action |
| 70 | + - we will design a simple interface for minting memes with robust yet simple economics |
| 71 | + - this approach allows us to harness the power of memes and [[cybergraph]] together |
| 72 | +- ## multinetwork support in cyb |
| 73 | + - we have a strong [[spacepussy]] narrative |
| 74 | + - however, there is currently no support in [[cyb]] |
| 75 | + - adding this support will bring [[cyber-sdk]] closer to its vision |
| 76 | + - this addition will also bring the power of memes to the [[cyber]] project |
| 77 | +- ## conclusion |
| 78 | + - we presented a roadmap for actions during upcoming hype |
| 79 | + - that must change price dynamics and economics of the project |
| 80 | + - we believe each of this actions will immediately bring positive outcome for all [[moon]] citizens |
0 commit comments