Skip to content

Conversation

@nagilson
Copy link
Member

@nagilson nagilson commented Aug 22, 2025

The timed task will cause the pipeline to fail. It may have a 'resume' feature we can check to see if it actually failed or not, but there is no way to pause the next task and 'pass' that 'resume' onto the next step, because the timed task is using a 'serverless' pool.

This method is more complicated but a better e2e approach.
This commit removes the line which does the publish so I can test that the deployment 'gate' in the environment actually works.

The timed task will cause the pipeline to fail. It may have a 'resume' feature we can check to see if it actually failed or not, but there is no way to pause the next task and 'pass' that 'resume' onto the next step, because the timed task is using a 'serverless' pool.

This method is more complicated but a better e2e approach.
This commit removes the line which does the publish so I can test that the deployment 'gate' in the environment actually works.
@nagilson nagilson force-pushed the nagilson-publish-as-deployment branch from 08016d2 to 269cf5a Compare August 22, 2025 21:05
@nagilson
Copy link
Member Author

nagilson commented Dec 4, 2025

Instead of trying to do all of this in an isolated deployment environment, we can separate the release pipeline into its own component, which is a more elegant approach. Thank you to @JoeRobich for the inspiration and assistance 🥳

#2515

@nagilson nagilson closed this Dec 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant