v0.3.8 release candidate 1

Author: zachary-foster

.Rbuildignore

@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
 ^hex_sticker$
 ^CRAN-RELEASE$
 ^CRAN-SUBMISSION$
+.github

NEWS.md

@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 # News 
 
+## metacoder 0.3.8
+
+* Maintenance release to fix CRAN check issues.
+
 ## metacoder 0.3.7
 
 * Maintenance release to fix CRAN check issues.

cran-comments.md

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 ## Test environments and check results
 
-
-### local: Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS, R 4.3.2 
+### Local computer: Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS, R version 4.4.2
 
 0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 notes
 
@@ -13,6 +12,30 @@ I am not sure why this note exists. I am using `R6::` in about 10 places in the
 All of the classes in the package are R6 classes, so it is definitely used.
 
 
-### WinBuilder:
 
-0 errors | 0 warnings | 0 notes
+### Winbuilder
+
+0 errors | 0 warnings | 1 notes
+
+```
+* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... [16s] NOTE
+Maintainer: 'Zachary Foster <zacharyfoster1989@gmail.com>'
+
+New submission
+
+Package was archived on CRAN
+
+CRAN repository db overrides:
+  X-CRAN-Comment: Archived on 2024-10-01 as issues were not corrected
+    in time.
+
+Suggests or Enhances not in mainstream repositories:
+  traits
+```
+
+`metacoder` was removed from CRAN because it dependency `taxize` was removed from CRAN.
+`taxize` is back on CRAN now, so `metacoder` is being resubmitted.
+The package `traits` was also removed from CRAN because it depends on `taxize` as well.
+It is only a suggested package for `metacoder` used for one function and I expect `traits` will be returned to CRAN as well soon.
+I am not sure if it is required for all packages in "Suggests" to be on CRAN or not.
+