Skip to content

Conversation

@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Dec 2, 2025

Since we already using junit 6 this is already kind correct naming, and in the future will more junit major releases, would just name it as junit

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from metacosm and xstefank December 2, 2025 09:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@xstefank xstefank left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Since we already using junit 6 this is already kind correct naming, and in the future
will more junit major releases, would just name it as junit

Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <a_meszaros@apple.com>
@csviri csviri merged commit 00190f2 into operator-framework:next Dec 4, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants