-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump sub #3408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump sub #3408
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
PR Review: chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump subSummaryThis PR performs a systematic rename of the "wake" terminology to "bump" throughout the gasoline workflow engine. The renaming improves clarity by using "bump" to describe the action of notifying workers to check for new work. Code Quality: ✅ ExcellentStrengths:
Naming conventions verified:
ObservationsPING_INTERVAL ChangeThe PR includes a change to -const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(20);
+const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10);Question: This change seems unrelated to the wake→bump rename. Was this intentional? If so, it might be worth:
The Potential Issues: None FoundNo bugs, security concerns, or logic errors detected. The renaming is mechanical and complete. Completeness Check: ✅I verified that no old "wake" terminology remains in the renamed contexts:
Note: There are still many "wake" references in the codebase related to wake conditions, wake indexes, wake deadlines, etc. (e.g., Testing:
|
More templates
@rivetkit/actor
@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers
@rivetkit/core
@rivetkit/db
@rivetkit/framework-base
@rivetkit/next-js
@rivetkit/react
rivetkit
@rivetkit/sql-loader
@rivetkit/engine-runner
@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol
commit: |
8cef849 to
7239ed4
Compare
c0c9897 to
44cfde4
Compare
7239ed4 to
9d4873b
Compare
44cfde4 to
851e83c
Compare
Code Review: PR #3408 - Rename wake sub to bump subOverviewThis PR performs a straightforward and well-executed terminology refactor, renaming ✅ Strengths
🔍 ObservationsFiles Modified:
Notable Change:
Unrelated but Good Change:
📝 Minor Suggestions
🧪 Testing Considerations
|
PR Review: Rename wake sub to bump subOverviewThis PR performs a focused refactoring that renames the "wake subscription" mechanism to "bump subscription" throughout the Gasoline workflow engine. The changes are purely cosmetic and improve code clarity. Code Quality ✅Consistency: The renaming is thorough and consistent across all relevant locations:
Naming Rationale: The new name "bump" better describes the actual behavior - notifying workers to check for new work rather than "waking" them from sleep. The workers are already polling periodically, and this mechanism just "bumps" them to check immediately. Potential Issues 🔍None identified - This is a pure refactoring with no logic changes. Performance Considerations ✅PING_INTERVAL Change: The PR includes an intentional change to
Security Concerns ✅No security implications - the pubsub mechanism remains unchanged, only the naming is different. Test Coverage 📋Existing Tests: The gasoline package has extensive test coverage including:
Test Impact: Since this is a pure rename with no behavioral changes, existing tests should provide adequate coverage. The tests don't need updates since they test the public API, not internal implementation details. Recommendation: Run the full test suite to verify no regressions: cargo test -p gasolineAdditional Notes
Verdict: ✅ ApprovedThis is a clean refactoring that improves code clarity. The only minor concern is clarifying whether the PING_INTERVAL change was intentional. Suggested next steps:
Great work on maintaining consistency throughout the codebase! 🎉 |
9d4873b to
8fa12cf
Compare
851e83c to
47e1dfc
Compare
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits |
PR Review - chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump subSummaryThis PR performs a straightforward refactoring that renames the "wake" terminology to "bump" throughout the gasoline workflow engine package. The changes are mechanical and consistent across 7 files. Code Quality ✅Positives:
Observations 🔍Unrelated change: -const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(20);
+const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10);This change in
Minor terminology improvement: -// Update wake deadline ts
+// Update wake deadline ts if earlierThis is a nice clarification that adds value beyond the simple rename. Naming Rationale 💭The "bump" terminology better conveys the concept of "nudging" workers to check for new work, which is more accurate than "wake" (which implies the worker was sleeping/idle). The new name aligns well with the actual behavior: publishing a message to prompt workers to poll the database again. Potential Issues 🟡None critical, but considerations:
Testing 🧪Recommendation: Since this is purely a refactoring with no logic changes, the existing test suite should provide adequate coverage. However, consider:
Security & Performance ✅No security or performance concerns identified. The pubsub subject name change is cosmetic and shouldn't affect message routing. Verdict ✅LGTM - This is a clean, well-executed refactoring that improves code clarity. The only suggestion is to address the unrelated Note: Consider adding a changelog entry or migration note if the pubsub subject name |
Code Review - PR #3408SummaryThis PR performs a straightforward refactoring that renames "wake" terminology to "bump" throughout the gasoline workflow engine. The changes are focused on improving semantic clarity around the worker notification mechanism. Positive Observations✅ Consistent Renaming: The rename is thorough and consistent across all affected files:
✅ Comment Updates: Comments have been updated to reflect the new terminology (e.g., "For pubsub bump mechanism"). ✅ Improved Clarity: The term "bump" more accurately describes the action of notifying workers to check for work, as opposed to "wake" which might imply workers were sleeping/inactive. Code Quality & Best PracticesWell Done:
Observations & Minor Notes
Potential Issues
While this doesn't break functionality, it creates inconsistent terminology that could confuse future maintainers. Recommendation: Consider a follow-up PR to complete the terminology migration, or revert to "wake" if "bump" is only meant for the subscription mechanism. Performance Considerations✅ No performance impact - purely a naming refactor (except for PING_INTERVAL change)
Security Concerns✅ No security implications identified Test Coverage✅ This is a refactoring PR with no functional changes (aside from PING_INTERVAL)
Note: The PING_INTERVAL change could benefit from testing to ensure it doesn't cause issues under load. Final RecommendationLGTM with suggestions - The core refactoring is solid and improves code clarity. However:
The PR is safe to merge as-is, but addressing these points would improve overall code quality. Review generated following CLAUDE.md conventions |
8fa12cf to
efac9a9
Compare
47e1dfc to
05fd9f6
Compare
PR Review: Rename wake_sub to bump_subSummaryThis PR performs a straightforward terminology refactoring, renaming Code Quality ✅Strengths:
Observations & Considerations1. Terminology ImprovementThe "bump" terminology is arguably clearer than "wake" in this context:
2. Method Naming:
|
efac9a9 to
fa34398
Compare
05fd9f6 to
4b7b6b5
Compare
PR Review: Rename wake terminology to bumpSummaryThis PR renames the "wake" terminology to "bump" throughout the Gasoline workflow engine. The changes are consistent and well-executed. Code Quality ✅Strengths:
Changes reviewed:
Completeness Check 🔍I verified that the renaming is complete:
Note on terminology scope: The term "wake" is still appropriately used in other contexts throughout the codebase (e.g., Minor Observation 🔧The PR includes one additional change beyond the renaming:
-const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(20);
+const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10);This reduces the ping interval from 20s to 10s. While this may be an intentional improvement, it's worth noting that:
Recommendation: Consider whether this change should be in a separate PR or if it should be documented in the PR description. Best Practices Alignment ✅According to CLAUDE.md guidelines:
Performance & Security 🟢
Test Coverage 📋This is a refactoring PR with no logic changes. The existing test suite should provide adequate coverage. Consider:
Verdict ✅Approved - This is a clean, well-executed refactoring that improves code clarity. The only consideration is the Suggested actions:
|
4b7b6b5 to
70e0557
Compare
fa34398 to
2564d3e
Compare
PR Review: chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump subSummaryThis PR performs a straightforward refactoring that renames the "wake" terminology to "bump" throughout the gasoline workflow engine. The renaming affects subscription mechanisms, pubsub subjects, function names, and related documentation. Positive Observations ✅
Concerns & Questions
|
PR Review: Rename wake_sub to bump_subSummaryThis PR performs a straightforward renaming refactor, changing terminology from "wake" to "bump" throughout the gasoline workflow engine. This is a good improvement to the codebase's clarity and consistency. Code Quality ✅Strengths:
Observations:
Potential Issues
|
PR Review: chore(gas): rename wake sub to bump subSummaryThis PR performs a consistent terminology rename throughout the gasoline workflow engine, changing "wake" to "bump" for the pubsub-based worker notification mechanism. This is a refactoring change that improves code clarity. Code Quality ✅The changes are well-executed with excellent consistency:
Observations 📝Intentional ChangeThe PR includes a reduction in
Comment ImprovementOne comment was enhanced at - // Update wake deadline ts
+ // Update wake deadline ts if earlierThis clarifies the conditional logic and is a good improvement. Testing Considerations 🧪Since this is primarily a refactoring:
Potential Issues
|
2564d3e to
657d42e
Compare
70e0557 to
277e2db
Compare
Merge activity
|
PR Review: Rename wake sub to bump subSummaryThis PR performs a comprehensive renaming from "wake" terminology to "bump" terminology throughout the gasoline workflow engine and introduces WebSocket hibernation support in the guard-core package. The changes are primarily refactoring with the addition of new WebSocket hibernation functionality. Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths
🔍 Code Quality ObservationsPositive:
Minor concerns:
Potential Issues
|
Pull Request Review: Rename wake_sub to bump_sub & WebSocket HibernationThis PR implements two main changes:
Overall Assessment✅ LGTM with minor observations The changes are well-structured, maintain backward compatibility through proper error handling, and include comprehensive test coverage. Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths
Specific Code ReviewWebSocket Hibernation Implementation (proxy_service.rs:1843-2018)✅ Good:
// This should be unreachable because as soon as the actor is
// reconnected to after hibernation the gateway will consume the close
// frame from the client ws streamThe
WebSocketHandle Changes (websocket_handle.rs:11-12, 30)✅ Good:
❓ Question: Custom Serve Trait (custom_serve.rs:13-16, 42-47)✅ Excellent Design:
PING_INTERVAL Reduction (worker.rs:17)-const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(20);
+const PING_INTERVAL: Duration = Duration::from_secs(10);
Security Concerns✅ No major security issues identified The hibernation mechanism properly:
Performance Considerations
Test Coverage✅ Excellent Test Coverage The new test (custom_serve.rs:260-320):
Suggestion: Consider adding a test case for the Minor Improvements
-// Update wake deadline ts
+// Update wake deadline ts if earlierGood clarification! ✅
-use anyhow::*;
+use anyhow::{Result, bail};Follows the updated CLAUDE.md guidelines. ✅
Recommendations
ConclusionThis is a solid PR that improves code clarity through consistent naming and adds a valuable hibernation feature for WebSocket connections. The implementation is well-tested and maintains backward compatibility. The minor observations noted above are suggestions for improvement rather than blocking issues. Approval: ✅ Approved with minor suggestions for future consideration |

No description provided.