feat!: migrate `utils/move-property` to `object/move-property` #8778

opbot-xd · 2025-12-04T12:14:59Z

Progresses #8755 (partial).

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

Migrates @stdlib/utils/move-property to @stdlib/object/move-property as the first package migration in RFC [RFC]: migrate utils packages to object (tracking issue) #8755
Adds the new @stdlib/object/move-property package with updated namespace references
Removes moveProperty from the @stdlib/utils namespace
Removes the original @stdlib/utils/move-property package

Note: This PR addresses only the utils/move-property => object/move-property migration. The remaining 10 packages listed in RFC #8755 will be handled in separate PRs as per the stdlib contributing guidelines for package migrations.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

[RFC]: migrate utils packages to object (tracking issue) #8755

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

This PR follows the same approach as #8736 which was used as a reference for the migration process.

Breaking Changes:

moveProperty is no longer accessible via require('@stdlib/utils').moveProperty
@stdlib/utils/move-property package is removed

Migration: Users should update their require/import paths from @stdlib/utils/move-property to @stdlib/object/move-property.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

Yes
No

If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?

Code generation (e.g., when writing an implementation or fixing a bug)
Test/benchmark generation
Documentation (including examples)
Research and understanding

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance. This helps reviewers determine how much scrutiny to apply when reviewing your contribution. Example disclosures: "This PR was written primarily by Claude Code." or "I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase, but the proposed changes were fully authored manually by myself.".

I used AI assistance for researching the stdlib codebase structure and understanding the package migration guidelines. The actual code changes were authored following the stdlib moving packages documentation and #8736 as reference.

@stdlib-js/reviewers

Ref: stdlib-js#8755 --- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: passed - task: lint_package_json status: passed - task: lint_repl_help status: passed - task: lint_javascript_src status: passed - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: passed - task: lint_javascript_tests status: passed - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed - task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed - task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

This commit removes the `moveProperty` symbol from the `@stdlib/utils` namespace due to a package migration. BREAKING CHANGE: remove `moveProperty` To migrate, users should access the same symbol via the `@stdlib/object` namespace. Ref: stdlib-js#8755

Ref: stdlib-js#8755

stdlib-bot · 2025-12-04T12:16:51Z

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
object/move-property	$\color{green}120/120$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{green}120/120$ $\color{green}+0.00%$
utils	$\color{red}45456/61696$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{red}759/803$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{red}23/509$ $\color{green}+0.00%$	$\color{red}45456/61696$ $\color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

opbot-xd · 2025-12-04T12:24:30Z

The lint check failure appears to be related to pre-existing OOM issues when linting
the large utils/docs/types/index.d.ts file, not caused by these changes.

Examples run successfully locally.

This commit removes `@stdlib/utils/move-property` in favor of `@stdlib/object/move-property`. BREAKING CHANGE: remove `utils/move-property` To migrate, users should update their require/import paths to use `@stdlib/object/move-property` which provides the same API and implementation. Ref: stdlib-js#8755

stdlib-bot · 2025-12-05T00:03:14Z

⚠️ Tracking Issue Closure Warning ⚠️

I noticed your PR description contains closing keywords ("Resolves", "Closes", or "Fixes") referencing a "Tracking Issue".

Why this matters:
Tracking issues should typically remain open until all related sub-issues are completed. GitHub automatically closes issues with such closing keywords when the PR is merged. For more information, see GitHub's documentation on using keywords in issues and pull requests.

Required action:
Use "Progresses" instead to reference the tracking issue without automatically closing it.

Thank you for your contribution to the project!

kgryte · 2025-12-05T02:46:14Z

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/utils/docs/types/index.d.ts

-import writablePropertySymbols = require( '@stdlib/utils/writable-property-symbols' );
-import writablePropertySymbolsIn = require( '@stdlib/utils/writable-property-symbols-in' );
-import zip = require( '@stdlib/utils/zip' );
+import any = require('@stdlib/utils/any');


All of these style changes should not have been made.

kgryte · 2025-12-05T02:46:43Z

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/utils/lib/index.js

 * @see {@link module:@stdlib/utils/any}
 */
-setReadOnly( utils, 'any', require( '@stdlib/utils/any' ) );
+setReadOnly(utils, 'any', require( '@stdlib/utils/any' ));


Same comment. None of these style changes should have been made.

kgryte · 2025-12-05T02:47:24Z

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/utils/README.md

This change should not have been made in this commit.

kgryte · 2025-12-05T02:50:17Z

@opbot-xd Thank you for looking into this. However, I am going to go ahead and close this PR, as your changes include several style changes which are not desired. Feel free to submit another PR which avoids such changes.

opbot-xd added 3 commits December 4, 2025 17:13

refactor: update paths

eb1b431

Ref: stdlib-js#8755

stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Dec 4, 2025

opbot-xd force-pushed the migrate-move-property branch from 86e5546 to f7d128e Compare December 4, 2025 12:29

kgryte added release: Major Breaking change requiring a new major release. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Dec 5, 2025

kgryte reviewed Dec 5, 2025

View reviewed changes

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/utils/README.md

Copy link

Member

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change should not have been made in this commit.

kgryte closed this Dec 5, 2025

kgryte changed the title ~~feat: migrate utils/move-property to object/move-property~~ feat!: migrate utils/move-property to object/move-property Dec 5, 2025

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

feat!: migrate `utils/move-property` to `object/move-property` #8778

feat!: migrate `utils/move-property` to `object/move-property` #8778

Uh oh!

opbot-xd commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited by kgryte

Loading

Uh oh!

stdlib-bot commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

opbot-xd commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

stdlib-bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

kgryte commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Uh oh!

feat!: migrate utils/move-property to object/move-property #8778

feat!: migrate utils/move-property to object/move-property #8778

Uh oh!

Conversation

opbot-xd commented Dec 4, 2025 • edited by kgryte Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Related Issues

Questions

Other

Checklist

AI Assistance

Disclosure

Uh oh!

stdlib-bot commented Dec 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Coverage Report

Uh oh!

opbot-xd commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

stdlib-bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kgryte Dec 5, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

kgryte commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

feat!: migrate `utils/move-property` to `object/move-property` #8778

feat!: migrate `utils/move-property` to `object/move-property` #8778

opbot-xd commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited by kgryte

Loading

stdlib-bot commented Dec 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading