Skip to content

Conversation

@soedirgo
Copy link
Member

@soedirgo soedirgo commented Nov 10, 2025

The latest version doesn't require node-gyp (for C compilation), so it should be less brittle on less common systems (e.g. NixOS)

Resolves PGMETA-83

@soedirgo soedirgo requested review from a team as code owners November 10, 2025 17:21
@soedirgo soedirgo force-pushed the chore/bump-pgsql-parser branch from 44a09be to 9f8bd58 Compare November 10, 2025 17:37
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 10, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 19276948782

Details

  • 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 82.958%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 19275454063: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 5924
Relevant Lines: 7000

💛 - Coveralls

@soedirgo soedirgo requested review from avallete and removed request for a team November 11, 2025 19:50
@soedirgo soedirgo closed this Nov 11, 2025
@soedirgo soedirgo reopened this Nov 11, 2025
The latest version doesn't require node-gyp (for C compilation), so it
should be less brittle on less common systems (e.g. NixOS)
@soedirgo soedirgo force-pushed the chore/bump-pgsql-parser branch from 9f8bd58 to c6fa93b Compare November 11, 2025 19:54
@soedirgo soedirgo merged commit 2b11c29 into master Nov 11, 2025
6 checks passed
@soedirgo soedirgo deleted the chore/bump-pgsql-parser branch November 11, 2025 21:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants