Skip to content

Actions: tidyverse/ggplot2

Actions

pr-commands.yaml

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
pr-commands.yaml
1,559 workflow runs
1,559 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

Should ggsave(bg) for the background colour? pr-commands.yaml #8148: Issue comment #6677 (comment) created by teunbrand
Skipped
Skipped
Should ggsave(bg) for the background colour? pr-commands.yaml #8147: Issue comment #6677 (comment) created by thomasp85
1s
1s
Class clash for annotation_custom default args pr-commands.yaml #8146: Issue comment #6675 (comment) created by bbcuffer
2s
2s
Class clash for annotation_custom default args pr-commands.yaml #8145: Issue comment #6675 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Class clash for annotation_custom default args pr-commands.yaml #8144: Issue comment #6675 (comment) created by bbcuffer
2s
2s
Class clash for annotation_custom default args pr-commands.yaml #8143: Issue comment #6675 (comment) created by teunbrand
4s
4s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8142: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Error when calling scale_linetype (where no error was present previously) pr-commands.yaml #8141: Issue comment #6669 (comment) created by teunbrand
2s
2s
Warnings with geom_area() with axis limits corresponding to min/max values being plotted introduced by ggplot2 v4.0.0 pr-commands.yaml #8140: Issue comment #6667 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
geom_spoke uses the wrong angle if radius is Inf in some cases pr-commands.yaml #8139: Issue comment #6671 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
geom_spoke uses the wrong angle if radius is Inf in some cases pr-commands.yaml #8138: Issue comment #6671 (comment) created by eliocamp
1s
1s
geom_spoke uses the wrong angle if radius is Inf in some cases pr-commands.yaml #8137: Issue comment #6671 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8136: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by Breeze-Hu
Skipped
Skipped
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8135: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8134: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8133: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by Breeze-Hu
Skipped
Skipped
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8132: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8131: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by Breeze-Hu
2s
2s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8130: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
2s
2s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8129: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by Breeze-Hu
1s
1s
scale_colour_manual: Colour for legend key when data is not visible in the plot pr-commands.yaml #8128: Issue comment #6666 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8127: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8126: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by Breeze-Hu
1s
1s
Feature request: Reasonable Representation of Spatial Data Axis Ranges within Faceting Processes pr-commands.yaml #8125: Issue comment #6670 (comment) created by teunbrand
1s
1s
Unexpected behavior with NaN pr-commands.yaml #8124: Issue comment #6668 (comment) created by kylebutts
1s
1s