-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
Fix: "Error response from daemon: no command specified" #315
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kpedro88
wants to merge
1
commit into
triton-inference-server:main
Choose a base branch
from
kpedro88:fix_create
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see no issue with skipping entry command, we don't need it
docker cpcommand.Container is used in rest, I mean there is no further usage to that container except retrieving libraries that has been compiled during it's image build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mc-nv can you clarify if this comment is in favor of the proposed change?
To be clear from my side, when I run the command:
I receive the error message:
Adding
/bin/bashto the end prevents this error and the build proceeds without further errors.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Current container created without purpose to be executed, only to use
docker cpcommand.And it's pretty much the same as:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that the container is only created in order to use
docker cp. Given that the container is first built two commands earlier, thedocker createcommand is necessary to usedocker cpon it.The commands you wrote using standard containers do work. However, the same command does not work with this container. Probably this could be fixed by modifying the Dockerfile to add an appropriate entry point. But the change proposed here is easier to implement and test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use
ENTRYPOINTmay be not suitable, as it designed to make container behave as executable which is not in this case.If you need to access the ONNX Runtime data after the build you can use the
TRITON_ONNXRUNTIME_DOCKER_IMAGEreference in your setup.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then it seems that my solution to resolve this error is preferable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@mc-nv is there anything else blocking this PR?