Skip to content

Conversation

@antonioalwan
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Describe what this PR is trying to do.

Type of change

  • Feature work
  • Bug fix
  • Documentation
  • Engineering change
  • Test
  • Logging/Telemetry

Risk

  • High – Errors could cause MAJOR regression of many scenarios. (Example: new large features or high level infrastructure changes)
  • Medium – Errors could cause regression of 1 or more scenarios. (Example: somewhat complex bug fixes, small new features)
  • Small – No issues are expected. (Example: Very small bug fixes, string changes, or configuration settings changes)

Additional information

CodeQL issue here

@antonioalwan antonioalwan requested a review from a team as a code owner October 24, 2025 02:40
@antonioalwan antonioalwan requested review from agubuzomaximus, Copilot and juan-arias and removed request for Copilot October 24, 2025 02:40
@juan-arias
Copy link
Member

@antonioalwan should the CodeQL pipeline checks pass?

@antonioalwan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@antonioalwan should the CodeQL pipeline checks pass?

Yep, there is still an issue waiting for CodeQL Office hours to re-discuss as what they suggested for me didn't work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants