-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
Dependent sums and products of cardinals #1604
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
I'm excited to see this work; I attempted once or twice to tackle the commutative semiring of cardinalities but didn't get very far. |
|
I'm not sure I will complete this work anytime soon, but it's sure been fun to think a little about. Let me know if any of this is blocking your work and I'll make it a priority to merge, or remove it if I will not finish it. |
Clarified the conclusion about `leq-Cardinal` being antisymmetric and a partial order, referencing the Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein theorem and the law of excluded middle.
|
This PR has now matured and is very soon ready for review. I'm pleased by the new concepts I introduce in this PR of "cardinality-recursive" and "cardinality-projective" sets. Both contain the finite sets. In particular we may constructively prove Kőnig's theorem for cardinality-projective sets. (EDIT: That will be part of a subsequent PR) |
|
Would you be willing to review it when it is done @lowasser? |
Depends on #1591