Skip to content

Conversation

@inaki-amatria
Copy link
Member

@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria commented Apr 3, 2025

Previously, nodes were defined using regexes, preventing them from being explicitly represented in the tree. This commit ensures that the children of these nodes are parsed as distinct nodes, making them accessible to third-party libraries/users/consumers.

@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria requested a review from a team April 3, 2025 09:01
@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria self-assigned this Apr 3, 2025
@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria requested review from alvrogd and igarcia0 and removed request for a team April 3, 2025 09:01
Previously, these nodes were defined using regexes, preventing them
from being explicitly represented in the tree.
@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria force-pushed the feature/UnhideOperatorNames branch from b7da5b8 to 31b263f Compare April 3, 2025 10:10
Copy link

@alvrogd alvrogd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria merged commit 31b263f into codee Apr 3, 2025
1 check passed
@inaki-amatria inaki-amatria deleted the feature/UnhideOperatorNames branch April 3, 2025 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants