-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Revise LinkedIn provider instructions for clarity + Advertising API r… #210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…equest form Updated text for clarity, added additional information on the Advertising API request form, and corrected minor grammatical errors.
|
@hobojoe1848 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Listinai Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Note
|
| Cohort / File(s) | Summary |
|---|---|
LinkedIn provider documentation pages/providers/linkedin.mdx |
Adds three new required LinkedIn products to the list; rewrites developer instructions for clarity ("fill in" → "fill out"); corrects "LinkedIN Page" label to "LinkedIn Page"; adds guidance paragraph about preparing information and clarifying data collection policies. |
Estimated code review effort
🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes
- Single documentation file with straightforward wording improvements and additions
- No complex logic or structural changes requiring detailed analysis
- Corrections are self-contained within one cohesive topic (LinkedIn provider setup)
Possibly related PRs
- Add details for Linkedin Pages integration #45 — Both PRs reference the "linkedin-page" integration and redirect URL in LinkedIn provider documentation.
- Update linkedin-page.mdx #59 — Both PRs modify LinkedIn provider docs and add the same three required products (Share on LinkedIn, Advertising API, Sign In with LinkedIn).
Suggested reviewers
- egelhaus
Poem
🐰 LinkedIn docs now shine so bright,
With products listed, left and right,
Three new friends join the fold,
"Fill out" replaces "fill in" of old,
Our documentation's crystal clear! ✨
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
| Check name | Status | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Description Check | ✅ Passed | Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled. |
| Title check | ✅ Passed | The title clearly and concisely describes the main changes: revising LinkedIn provider instructions for clarity and adding the Advertising API request form. |
| Docstring Coverage | ✅ Passed | No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. |
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
- Create PR with unit tests
- Post copyable unit tests in a comment
📜 Recent review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/providers/linkedin.mdx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pages/providers/linkedin.mdx (5)
14-18: Required products list is clear and helpful.The three required products (Share on LinkedIn, Advertising API, Sign In with LinkedIn using OpenID Connect) are explicitly defined, which provides helpful guidance for developers setting up the integration.
22-22: Consistent form terminology.Using "fill out" for form submission is idiomatic and aligns with standard documentation conventions.
24-24: Developer guidance is practical and actionable.The new paragraph provides useful preparation tips and actionable advice (mentioning the app doesn't collect member data) that helps developers navigate the Advertising API request process successfully. The reference to LinkedIn's official documentation adds credibility.
28-28: Correct branding capitalization.Using "LinkedIn Page" (not "LinkedIN") aligns with official LinkedIn branding standards.
36-36: Improved navigation guidance.Explicitly referencing the "Auth Tab" of the "LinkedIn App in the developer portal" provides clear guidance for locating Client ID and Client Secret.
Tip
📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!
You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
- Provide your own instructions using the
high_level_summary_instructionssetting. - Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
- Use
high_level_summary_in_walkthroughto move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.
Example instruction:
"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:
- 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
- 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
- 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
- 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
| Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |- ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.
…equest form
Updated text for clarity, added additional information on the Advertising API request form, and corrected minor grammatical errors.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.