-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
Add incidentEdgeTracker and indexCellData types and tests #180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
rsned
wants to merge
15
commits into
golang:master
Choose a base branch
from
rsned:internal
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
40abfda
Add incidentEdgeTracker and indexCellData types and tests
rsned db83ebf
remove some extraneous bits
rsned 394b634
Fix LaxPolygon to properly order vertices between shells and holes.
rsned 8aa64ba
Merge branch 'golang:master' into internal
rsned 475ef64
Update s2/index_cell_data.go
rsned 2b1704c
Update s2/index_cell_data_test.go
rsned 9dd01a8
Add missing body for laxPolygonFromLoops and missing test messages.
rsned d1c19d1
Merge branch 'internal' of ssh://github.com/rsned/geo into internal
rsned cbe002a
Update index_cell_data with review requests. Updated tests.
rsned 8e8bb75
Updated comments based on Javas clearer comments.
rsned f7a8070
Merge branch 'golang:master' into internal
rsned 28c6c5d
clean up test message
rsned 3485ea5
yMerge branch 'internal' of ssh://github.com/rsned/geo into internal
rsned 3be7c55
rename shapeRange to indexShapeRange to be more specific.
rsned f11e62a
remove unneeded LaxPolygonFromLoops.
rsned File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error handling across these functions is pretty bad. Here, you silently drop edges. There's no checking to ensure that calls are made in the right sequence. Should we re-examine the API to make erroneous usage more difficult? All the internal calls to the C++ version look like:
incident_edge_tracker_.StartShape(shape_id); for (const auto& edge : CurrentCell().shape_edges(shape_id)) { incident_edge_tracker_.AddEdge(edge.id, edge); } incident_edge_tracker_.FinishShape();So we could have an interface that looks like:
This would also remove the need for a "nursery" and the associated type, resolving one of my other comments.