fix broken CI #146
Open
fix broken CI #146
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
k8s-ci-robot
added
kind/cleanup
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/M
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sanposhiho, saza-ku The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
lgtm
Contributor
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
Contributor
Author
|
The testdata CI failed because modes of the Wasm files changed. I fixed CI so that it ignores the file modes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
This is follow-up of #142 . The previous PR breaks CI. This PR fixes things broken by #142.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
The CI will still fail because of #144
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
What are the benchmark results of this change?