-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[Snyk] Security upgrade octokit from 2.1.0 to 5.0.2 #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUEST-8730853 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUESTERROR-8730854
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @paaschdigital, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
As gemini-code-assist, I've reviewed this pull request. The primary goal of this PR, automatically generated by Snyk, is to address two medium-severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerabilities found in the octokit dependency. To fix these issues, the PR proposes a significant version upgrade for octokit from ^2.0.3 to ^5.0.2 within the examples/notion-github-sync/package.json file. It's important to note that this is a major version bump, which Snyk metadata indicates could potentially introduce breaking changes. Reviewers should carefully check the impact of this upgrade on the notion-github-sync example.
Highlights
- Security Vulnerability Fix: This PR was automatically created by Snyk to fix two medium-severity ReDoS vulnerabilities (
SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUEST-8730853,SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUESTERROR-8730854) found in theoctokitdependency. - Dependency Version Upgrade: The
octokitdependency inexamples/notion-github-sync/package.jsonis being upgraded from version^2.0.3to^5.0.2. - Potential Breaking Change: The upgrade involves a major version jump (from 2.x to 5.x), which is flagged by Snyk as potentially introducing breaking changes. Reviewers should verify compatibility within the
notion-github-syncexample.
Changelog
- examples/notion-github-sync/package.json
- Upgraded the
octokitdependency version from^2.0.3to^5.0.2to address security vulnerabilities.
- Upgraded the
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Version numbers climb,
Fixing bugs, adding features,
Hope tests still pass green.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request, automatically generated by Snyk, upgrades the octokit dependency from ^2.1.0 to ^5.0.2. This is a commendable step as it addresses two medium-severity ReDoS vulnerabilities (SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUEST-8730853 and SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUESTERROR-8730854).
However, this is a significant major version jump (from v2 to v5), which often introduces breaking changes. The Snyk metadata for this PR itself indicates isBreakingChange:true. My primary concern, detailed in the comment below, revolves around the updated Node.js version requirement for octokit v5.x.x and its dependencies.
I recommend addressing the points raised before merging to ensure the example remains functional and maintainable for users.
Summary of Findings
- Node.js Version Requirement: The upgrade to
octokitv5.0.2 introduces a dependency on Node.js v14.17.0 or later. This is a potential breaking change if the execution environment or users of this example use older Node.js versions. This requirement should be documented and ideally enforced via theenginesfield inpackage.json. - Need for Thorough Testing: Given the major version jump from
octokitv2 to v5, it's crucial to thoroughly test thenotion-github-syncexample to confirm that all functionalities, particularly GitHub API interactions like issue fetching and pagination, work correctly with the new library version. - Documentation Update: The
README.mdfor this example should be updated to reflect the new Node.js version requirement to guide users correctly.
Merge Readiness
This pull request addresses important security vulnerabilities by upgrading octokit. However, due to the major version jump and the introduction of a stricter Node.js version requirement (>=14.17.0), I recommend that the suggested changes (testing, documentation update, and potentially adding an engines field to package.json) are addressed before merging. This will ensure the example remains functional and clear for users. As an AI, I am not authorized to approve pull requests; please ensure further review and approval by project maintainers after addressing these concerns.
| "dotenv": "^16.0.1", | ||
| "lodash": "^4.17.21", | ||
| "octokit": "^2.0.3" | ||
| "octokit": "^5.0.2" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Upgrading octokit from ^2.1.0 to ^5.0.2 is a major version change and introduces a critical new requirement: Node.js v14.17.0 or later.
Dependencies of octokit v5.0.2, such as @octokit/core v5.x, @octokit/plugin-paginate-rest v7.x, and @octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods v9.x, explicitly require Node.js >= 14.17.0. The previous version, octokit v2.1.0, supported older Node.js versions (e.g., Node 10).
This could be a breaking change if the environment where this example is run, or if users attempting to run this example, are on an older Node.js version. The Snyk metadata for this PR also flags this as a breaking change (isBreakingChange:true).
To ensure the continued functionality and clarity of this example, could you please consider the following actions?
- Verify Functionality: Thoroughly test this
notion-github-syncexample withoctokitv5.0.2 and a compatible Node.js version (>=14.17.0) to ensure the existing logic, especially the pagination part inindex.js(lines 112-129), still works as expected. While the pagination code structure appears compatible, subtle API changes are always possible with major version bumps. - Update Documentation: Modify the
examples/notion-github-sync/README.mdto clearly state the required Node.js version (e.g., Node.js 14.17.0 or later). - Specify Engine (Recommended): Consider adding an
enginesfield to thispackage.jsonto formally declare the Node.js version requirement. For example:This helps prevent runtime issues for users with incompatible Node.js versions."engines": { "node": ">=14.17.0" }
Addressing these points will help maintain the example's usability and prevent unexpected failures for its users.
Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
examples/notion-github-sync/package.jsonVulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:
SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUEST-8730853
SNYK-JS-OCTOKITREQUESTERROR-8730854
Important
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)