Skip to content

Conversation

@pylint-backport
Copy link
Contributor

Backport 1496340 from #10724.

* Fix a false positive for ``unbalanced-tuple-unpacking`` when a tuple is assigned to a function call and the structure of the function's return value is ambiguous.

Closes #10721

Co-authored-by: Pierre Sassoulas <pierre.sassoulas@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1496340)
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added this to the 4.0.3 milestone Nov 8, 2025
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas enabled auto-merge (squash) November 8, 2025 08:14
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas added the False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code label Nov 8, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.97%. Comparing base (1a26dea) to head (ec5770f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on maintenance/4.0.x.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           maintenance/4.0.x   #10726      +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage              95.96%   95.97%   +0.01%     
=====================================================
  Files                    176      176              
  Lines                  19521    19521              
=====================================================
+ Hits                   18734    18736       +2     
+ Misses                   787      785       -2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
pylint/checkers/variables.py 97.28% <100.00%> (+0.13%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas merged commit b128b7d into maintenance/4.0.x Nov 9, 2025
23 checks passed
@Pierre-Sassoulas Pierre-Sassoulas deleted the backport-10724-to-maintenance/4.0.x branch November 9, 2025 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

False Positive 🦟 A message is emitted but nothing is wrong with the code

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants