Skip to content

Conversation

@silabs-bozont
Copy link

Hey friends!
This PR adds support for the Nano Matter including:

  • Basic platform, CoreAPI and flashing support
  • GPIO
  • PWM
  • I2C/Wire
  • SPI
  • Bluetooth LE

All of these have been tested and confirmed to function, but feel free to do any additional testing!

ADC support is missing from the main Zephyr repo for the Nano Matter - I'm currently working on adding it. Once it's there I'll also include it here in a separate PR. Besides this the board has a pretty well rounded functionality.

OpenOCD 0.12.0-arduino1-static will have to be added to the package.json file - but I assume you keep that separately. This is needed for flasing the Nano Matter.

Please, let me know if you have any remarks and I'll fix them as soon as possible!

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@silabs-bozont silabs-bozont changed the title Add support for the Arduino Nano Matter board: add support for the Arduino Nano Matter Nov 11, 2025
@per1234 per1234 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2025
Copy link

@pillo79 pillo79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for mentioning the new required tool in the PR notes. Please add it to extra/artifacts/_common.json so that CI generates the correct files automatically.

@silabs-bozont
Copy link
Author

@pillo79 Thanks for mentioning the new required tool in the PR notes. Please add it to extra/artifacts/_common.json so that CI generates the correct files automatically.

Thank you for the pointer, I've added it. Could you please check if it's correct?

Copy link

@pillo79 pillo79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM (not tested though). @silabs-bozont you should accept the CLA for us to use this in our repo though 😉 thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants