-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
chore(rivetkit): fix type checks #3462
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
PR Review: Type Check FixesSummaryThis PR addresses TypeScript type checking issues in the RivetKit TypeScript package by updating lifecycle hook names and improving type safety around the request context. The changes primarily involve:
Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive:
Concerns:
Potential Bugs
Performance Considerations
Security Concerns
Test CoverageObservations:
Recommendations:
Consider adding tests for edge cases around the request context. Additional NotesAsyncAPI Spec Changes:
Frontend Cleanup: Type Safety in Recommendations Summary
VerdictThis PR makes valuable improvements to type safety and API consistency. The main concerns are around ensuring proper error handling patterns and verifying all lifecycle hook renames are complete. Once the error throwing pattern is fixed and the potential null reference in websocket.ts is addressed, this should be good to merge. Overall: Approve with suggested changes ✅ Review generated by Claude Code |
More templates
@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers
@rivetkit/db
@rivetkit/framework-base
@rivetkit/next-js
@rivetkit/react
rivetkit
@rivetkit/sql-loader
@rivetkit/engine-runner
@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol
commit: |
2e4753e to
9031170
Compare
3985a9e to
8ea24ef
Compare
PR Review: chore(rivetkit): fix type checksSummaryThis PR fixes TypeScript type errors across RivetKit by updating lifecycle hooks and API method names to match the current API. The changes reflect a migration from ✅ Positive Observations
🔍 Issues and Concerns1. Error Handling - Critical Issue
|
PR Review: Type Check FixesThis PR addresses TypeScript type checking issues across the RivetKit codebase. Overall, the changes are clean and consistent, successfully improving type safety. Here's my detailed review: ✅ Strengths
🔍 Observations & Recommendations1. Error Handling in cursors-raw-websocket (Line 60)if (!c.request) throw "Missing request";Observation: Using string literal throws is not a best practice. Recommendation: Consider using a proper Error object for better stack traces and debugging: if (!c.request) throw new Error("Missing request");2. Node.js Module Loading StrategyIn Good:
Potential Concern:
Minor: The webpack ignore comments ( 3. Cloudflare Workers onStop ReferenceIn // Line 300 - Should this be onSleep instead of onStop?
await actor.onStop("destroy");Action Required: Verify if this internal method name was intentionally kept as 4. AsyncAPI ChangesThe AsyncAPI file changes appear to be purely cosmetic (spacing/formatting). Verify that:
5. Missing Test CoverageObservation: The PR doesn't include any test file updates. Recommendation: Consider verifying that:
🔒 SecurityNo security concerns identified. The changes improve type safety which indirectly enhances security. ⚡ PerformanceNo performance impact expected. The changes are primarily type-related and API renames. 🎯 SummaryVerdict: This is a solid cleanup PR that improves type safety across the codebase. Before Merge:
Nice to have:
Great work on maintaining consistency across the codebase! 🎉 |
8ea24ef to
a3beed3
Compare
9031170 to
007bec8
Compare
|
Deployment failed with the following error: Learn More: https://vercel.com/docs/limits#rate-limits |
PR Review: chore(rivetkit): fix type checksSummaryThis PR addresses TypeScript type checking issues across the RivetKit codebase. The changes primarily involve:
Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Positive Observations
|
Merge activity
|
a3beed3 to
7a3a586
Compare
007bec8 to
1da30ef
Compare
PR Review: chore(rivetkit): fix type checksSummaryThis PR fixes TypeScript type checking issues by:
Code Quality ✅Positive aspects:
Potential Issues
|
7a3a586 to
d58f1db
Compare
1da30ef to
94644ac
Compare
PR Review: Type Check FixesI've reviewed this PR which focuses on fixing type checks in the RivetKit TypeScript codebase. Overall, the changes are solid and improve type safety. Here's my detailed analysis: ✅ Positive Changes1. Lifecycle Hook Renaming (onStart/onStop → onWake/onSleep)
2. HTTP Handler Renaming (onFetch → onRequest)
3. WebSocket Handler Signature Improvements
4. Request Validation
5. Frontend Cleanup
6. AsyncAPI JSON Formatting
7. Node.js Utils Enhancement
8. Cloudflare Workers Driver
|
Pull Request Review: chore(rivetkit): fix type checksSummaryThis PR addresses TypeScript type checking issues in RivetKit by:
Code Quality ✅Positive aspects:
Areas for consideration:
Potential Bugs 🔍No critical bugs identified, but some observations:
Performance Considerations ⚡No performance concerns. These are purely API signature and naming updates. Security Concerns 🔒Minor concern:
Test Coverage 🧪Observations:
Recommendation:
Adherence to CLAUDE.md Standards ✅Followed:
Could improve:
Summary of RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority: Low Priority: Overall AssessmentRating: ✅ Approved with minor suggestions This is a solid refactoring PR that addresses type checking issues and API consistency. The changes are minimal, focused, and maintain backward compatibility through clear naming improvements. The only concerns are minor code quality improvements around error handling and type safety. Great work maintaining consistency across all examples and tests! 🎉 |
d58f1db to
fc21704
Compare
94644ac to
f3bbd90
Compare
f3bbd90 to
8ce6318
Compare
Code Review for PR #3462: chore(rivetkit): fix type checksI've reviewed this pull request and here's my feedback: SummaryThis PR appears to be a cleanup/refactoring that fixes TypeScript type issues across the RivetKit codebase. The changes include:
✅ Positive Observations1. API Consistency Improvements
2. Better Null Safety
3. Code Simplification
4. JSON Formatting
|
PR Review: Type Check FixesSummaryThis PR addresses TypeScript type checking issues in the RivetKit codebase, primarily focusing on API renaming and improving type safety across examples and core packages. Positive Aspects ✅
Areas for Improvement 🔍1. Error Handling - cursors-raw-websocket/registry.ts:60if (!c.request) throw "Missing request";Issue: Throwing a string instead of a proper Error object is an anti-pattern. Recommendation: if (!c.request) throw new Error("Missing request");Or better yet, if this is part of RivetKit's error system mentioned in CLAUDE.md, use the custom error handling: if (!c.request) throw new ActorRequestError().build();2. Missing Context - cloudflare-workers/actor-driver.tsThe changes in this file look good, but I notice the comment on line 290 still says "Spawn onStop in background" when calling Question: Should the internal 3. Type Safety - websocket.ts:4export function handleWebSocket(c: any, websocket: UniversalWebSocket) {Issue: Using Recommendation: Define a proper type for the context parameter. For example: import type { ActorContext } from 'rivetkit'; // or appropriate type
export function handleWebSocket(c: ActorContext<typeof demo>, websocket: UniversalWebSocket) {4. AsyncAPI Schema ChangesThe massive reformatting (435 additions, 488 deletions) makes it difficult to identify actual semantic changes. Questions:
Performance Considerations ⚡No significant performance concerns. The changes are primarily type-related and don't introduce algorithmic complexity or resource usage changes. Security Concerns 🔒Low Risk: No obvious security vulnerabilities introduced. The null check added in cursors-raw-websocket actually improves defensive programming. Test Coverage 🧪Concern: This PR updates test files (smoke/registry.ts) and example code but doesn't appear to include any new tests for the renamed APIs. Recommendations:
Minor Observations
VerdictRecommendation: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions The PR successfully addresses type checking issues and improves API consistency. The main concerns are:
These are relatively minor issues that could be addressed in a follow-up PR if needed, but ideally should be fixed before merging for better code quality. Questions for the Author
|
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR updates RivetKit to fix type checks by renaming lifecycle hooks and fixing type inconsistencies across the codebase. The changes align with the current API design documented in ✅ Positive Aspects
🔍 Issues and Concerns1. Inconsistent Error Handling (Medium Priority)Location: if (!c.request) throw "Missing request";Issue: Throwing a raw string instead of a proper Error object is not best practice. This makes error handling and stack traces less useful. Recommendation: if (!c.request) throw new Error("Missing request");2. Type Safety Concern (Medium Priority)Location: The fact that Question: Should 3. Missing Import Fix (Low Priority)Location: While the addition of 4. Incomplete AsyncAPI ChangesLocation: The diff was truncated ( Recommendation: Verify that no semantic changes were made to the API specification beyond formatting. 🧪 Testing Recommendations
📋 Code Quality Assessment
🔒 Security ConsiderationsNo security concerns identified. The changes are primarily type corrections and API naming consistency. ⚡ Performance ConsiderationsNo performance impact expected. These are compile-time type fixes and API renames without algorithmic changes. 📝 Suggested Improvements
✨ Overall AssessmentStatus: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions This is a solid PR that fixes important type consistency issues in RivetKit. The lifecycle hook renames are necessary and correct. The minor issues identified are non-blocking but should be addressed for better code quality. The changes properly align the implementation with the type definitions in Reviewed by: Claude Code |

No description provided.