-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
chore(website): flatten actors docs structure #3280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
chore(website): flatten actors docs structure #3280
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
2 Skipped Deployments
|
Pull Request ReviewSummaryThis PR refactors the website marketing homepage and documentation structure by flattening the actors docs structure and enhancing the homepage with new sections showcasing use cases and deployment options. Code Quality & Best PracticesStrengths
Issues Found1. Typo in self-hosting/index.mdx line 6 2. Broken link in DeploymentOptionsSection.tsx line 69 3. Grammar in HeroSection.tsx line 26 4. Commented code in HeroSection.tsx Potential Bugs1. UseCases.tsx lines 135-142 2. UseCases.tsx handleMouseMove Test CoverageNo tests included for new components. Consider adding unit tests and link validation tests. RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority:
Overall AssessmentSolid refactoring with good code quality. Main issues are minor but should be fixed before merging. Recommendation: Request changes for typo, broken link, and grammar fixes. |
fbfaf7f to
85bb318
Compare
4d16d13 to
3c9700f
Compare
PR Review: chore(website): flatten actors docs structureI've reviewed this PR and found that while the PR title mentions "flatten actors docs structure", the changes are primarily focused on refactoring Node.js module imports in the rivetkit-typescript package to support cross-platform compatibility (likely for edge/browser environments). Here's my detailed feedback: 🔴 Critical Issues1. Security Vulnerability: Timing-Safe Comparison RemovedLocation: The // TODO:
// // Perform timing-safe comparison
// if (!crypto.timingSafeEqual(a, b)) {
// return false;
// }
return true; // This always returns true now!Impact: This is a critical security vulnerability. The function now always returns Recommendation:
Example fix: export function compareSecrets(providedSecret: string, validSecret: string) {
if (providedSecret.length !== validSecret.length) {
return false;
}
const encoder = new TextEncoder();
const a = encoder.encode(providedSecret);
const b = encoder.encode(validSecret);
// Constant-time comparison
let result = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
result |= a[i] ^ b[i];
}
return result === 0;
}
|
3c9700f to
5e287ca
Compare
PR Review: Flatten Actors Docs StructureSummaryThis PR updates the Rivet website marketing pages and documentation structure. While the PR title mentions "flatten actors docs structure," the changes are primarily focused on enhancing the marketing homepage with new sections and visual improvements. Code Quality & Best Practices✅ Strengths
|
PR Review: Website Homepage RestructuringSummaryThis PR restructures the marketing website homepage with new sections for use cases and deployment options. The changes focus on improving the presentation of Rivet's capabilities and deployment flexibility. Code Quality & Best Practices ✅Strengths
Suggestions for Improvement1. Typo in HeroSection.tsx:26Line 26 has "in to" which should be "into" (one word): 2. Duplicate Use Case Definitions in use-cases.tsThe useCases array has duplicate entries:
Recommendation: Remove duplicates and consolidate to single, well-named entries. 3. IconWithSpotlight Component - Hardcoded SVG PathsThe getPathData() function at IconWithSpotlight.tsx:7-32 has massive inline SVG path strings. This makes the code hard to read and maintain, increases bundle size, and violates DRY principle. Recommendation: Import the SVG files directly or extract paths to a separate constants file. 4. UseCases.tsx - Non-null AssertionsLines 135-141 use non-null assertions (!) which can throw runtime errors if use cases are renamed/removed. Add error handling or use a safer lookup pattern with filtering. 5. Commented-Out Code CleanupMultiple files have large blocks of commented code:
Recommendation: Remove commented code before merging. Performance Considerations ⚡1. Mouse Move Handler PerformanceUseCases.tsx:27-45 implements a handleMouseMove handler that queries the DOM on every mouse move. Consider adding throttling/debouncing for better performance (target ~60fps). 2. Large SVG Path DataThe inline SVG paths in IconWithSpotlight are substantial. Consider using SVG sprites, lazy loading icons, or tree-shaking unused icon paths. Security Concerns 🔒✅ External links properly use rel="noopener noreferrer" and target="_blank" Test Coverage 🧪Missing: No test files included in this PR. Recommendations:
Additional Observations
SummaryApproval Status: ✅ Approve with minor changes recommended This is a solid PR that improves the website structure and content presentation. The main issues are:
None of these issues are blocking, but addressing them will improve code quality and prevent future bugs. 🤖 Generated with Claude Code |
4a72d89 to
0ceae4a
Compare
9737523 to
1a35970
Compare
PR Review: Website Marketing Page UpdatesOverviewThis PR updates the website's marketing homepage with new sections, improved messaging, and better content organization. The title mentions 'flatten actors docs structure' but the changes are primarily focused on the marketing homepage redesign. Summary of Changes
Code QualityStrengths
Issues Found1. Typo in Documentation (website/src/content/docs/self-hosting/index.mdx:6)
2. Non-null Assertion Operator Overuse (UseCases.tsx:135-141)
3. Commented Code Bloat (HeroSection.tsx)
4. Mouse event handler performance (UseCases.tsx:27-45)
5. Inconsistent Icon Path Pattern
Security✅ No critical issues found
Test Coverage
SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ Approve with minor changes recommended Must Fix Before Merge:
Should Fix (can be follow-up PR): Great work on improving the marketing page! The new sections provide much clearer guidance for users on deployment options. |
0ceae4a to
bc6d477
Compare
1a35970 to
8dda32a
Compare
PR Review: Website Marketing Page EnhancementsThis PR enhances the Rivet website's marketing homepage with new sections showcasing deployment options and use cases. Code Quality - Strengths
Potential Bugs & Issues
Performance Considerations
RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority: Low Priority: SummarySolid frontend enhancement with clean code and good UX. Main concerns are data duplication, potential runtime errors, and the typo. With high-priority fixes, this should be ready to merge. Recommendation: Approve with minor changes requested |
PR Review: Website Documentation Structure FlatteningSummaryThis PR updates the marketing website homepage with new sections and content reorganization. Code Quality & Best Practices ✅Strengths:
Areas for Improvement:
Potential Bugs 🐛
Security ✅
Test Coverage 🧪No tests added. Consider:
RecommendationsHigh Priority:
Medium Priority:
ConclusionSolid PR with good code quality. Minor typos and potential runtime errors need addressing. Overall: ✅ Approve with minor changes requested |

No description provided.